"The GTX 780's proximity to the performance of the much more expensive Titan is borne out by our challenging outdoors Crysis 3 playtest." Crysis 3 compared on the GTX Titan and the newer, cheaper GTX 780. 3DMark benches the entire system which isn't entirely relevant for a GPU shoot-out, so we've reserved our analysis for the graphics scores only. Our test system here is a Core i7 3770K overclocked to 4.3GHz combined with 1600MHz DDR3 RAM operating in dual-channel configuration. For resolution, we're going with 2560x1440 - the 2.5K standard that's swiftly becoming very affordable, and represents a tangible leap in detail over the de facto standard 1080p. Anti-aliasing can still bring frame-rates crashing down - even if you're running three Titans in SLI - so we've opted for SMAA 2x owing to its excellent results at high resolutions and its very light impact on GPU performance. There's no better game for testing a high-end GPU than Crytek's Crysis 3, set to the very high quality preset. Nvidia reckons that we're looking at a boost of almost 70 per cent, and based on the few isolated tests we carried out, it easily meets the target in almost all modern games.īut the real story here is the notion that Nvidia is effectively giving away something very close to Titan performance with a substantial price cut, so let's put that to the test, kicking off with a quick test in actual gameplay conditions. GTX 680 offered a generational leap in power and performance over its predecessor and, factoring in the Titan-class performance offered by the GTX 780, the older GTX 580 doesn't stand a chance. Having attended Nvidia's press briefing on the new card, it seems that the company is very keen indeed on evangelising its latest line to those still gaming on older GPU technology and it's easy to see why. The GTX 680's only real advantage is clock speed - its operating speed hovers around 1GHz, 20 per cent or so faster. 1536 in the GTX 680, 192 texture units vs. "All the high-end workmanship on the shell, cooling and acoustics of the Titan has been transferred to the new GTX 780 with no real compromises."Īs the price moves down for top-tier performance, the comparisons with the existing 680 become a lot more valid, and it's here that the clear leap in specs over the current, "affordable" state-of-the-art is truly pronounced - 2304 CUDA cores vs. However, for our main purposes - gameplay - there are no savage cutbacks at all, and bearing in mind the cost saving, it's really difficult to recommend Titan at all now. In order to preserve the top-end offering's charms as a super-computer surrogate, double-precision floating performance (FP64) has been ruthlessly nerfed, giving Titan a huge advantage here. The only other major difference between the Titan and the GTX 780 comes down to raw Compute performance. On the plus side, the reduction in CUDA cores gives the GTX 780 a little more room to breathe within its 250W TDP power budget, meaning that both core clock and the auto-overclocking boost clock are a little higher than Titan. In our testing we found that this made no difference at all, but as next-gen kicks in, RAM allocation may well become more important. The biggest cutback comes from the GDDR5 allocation - it's 6GB on Titan, and 3GB on the GTX 780. ![]() Titan's 2688 CUDA cores gets a haircut down to 2304, while the 224 texture units are pared back to 192. ![]() At stock speeds, you're basically getting 90 per cent of the raw graphical power for 65 per cent of the price. Performance-wise, there have been nips and tucks though. The GTX 780 lops off £300/$350 from the price of the Titan, but in many ways it is exactly the same product - the same PCB, the same premium, magnesium-effect aluminium casing, the same ultra-quiet cooling system and crucially the same 7.1-billion transistor GK110 processor. However, we've got the feeling that this rush for the gold standard in gaming performance from the most committed of PC gamers may now be coming to a close with the release of the new GTX 780. ![]() Indeed, Titan even outsold the more powerful dual-GPU GTX 690, which retailed at the same price. performance maths just didn't work out - Titan was twice the cost of the GTX 680 for just a 50 per cent boost in frame-rates.ĭespite that, the allure of Titan was difficult to resist for the ultra-hardcore enthusiast - Nvidia sold every unit it produced. Nvidia had defined a new "luxury" price point for its most capable graphics card, but the price vs. Titan retailed at £850 in the UK and $1000 in North America. But that level of pure GPU grunt came at a cost - a vast one. Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan ushered in a new era of single-chip GPU performance - the ultimate example of the power and performance of the firm's wildly successful "Kepler" architecture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |